Showing posts with label institution of marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label institution of marriage. Show all posts

Friday, October 31, 2014

My Friends’ Wedding


Several weeks ago, because of action not taken by the United States Supreme Court, a number of states made it legal for gays and lesbians to get married. One of the states is where I live, Colorado.

I have been friends with Jan and Joan for 30 years. They have been together as a couple for almost 38 years. They are quite dear to me and even when I moved back East for 20 plus years, their friendship remained vital and fulfilling. I have always known them as a couple and over the years developed an additional relationship with each of them, which only made them as a couple richer for me.

Last year, the State of Colorado granted same-sex couples the right to get civil unions. At that time, Jan and Joan went through that process. When Colorado settled into what looked to be a permanent decision about offering same-sex marriages Jan and Joan did a lot of soul searching about whether or not to go for it.

Some of the issues of financial security and those kinds of legalities seemed important in that marriage could offer protection and therefore be a good reason to get married. One of these women was profoundly unprotected as the law goes. That was definitely a strong consideration.

Philosophically there were a lot of issues that came up. Marriage has long been considered an institution dominated by men. We still do not have all the rights men do. So, given the nature of marriage, it brought pause when considering the politics of lesbians entering into such a patriarchal agreement.

Joan, who works with taxes in her career, was ready to get married. Jan went back and forth. The deciding factor that finally convinced Jan was the realization that she could get another ring. It is difficult to know what exactly will push a person one way or another in something as important as this decision. Since the real, spiritual and personal reasons for being together had been proven over the last thirty-eight years--getting married brought of different issues and challenges for them than couples who are just entering into their lives together.

I was invited to go to the County Clerk’s Office to be a witness. When I got to their home they were dressed up and nervous. They had already exchanged their vows and exchanged rings. They had carefully selected something old, something new, something borrowed and something blue. They were so cute! Here are these young 60 something year old dykes going to get married. Wow!!!!!!!!!!

When we got to the County Clerk’s Office we got number 21 and sat waiting while people ahead of us got license plates and such. The line went quickly and then it was our turn. The woman at the window was the same one who had done Jan and Joan’s civil union. That was the first one of those she had done and this was her first same-sex marriage license. There were a lot of laughs as well as some not so supportive looks from those whose numbers hadn’t yet been called. We were completely giddy and delighted.


I reflected on the way home how sweet Jan and Joan’s love for one another expressed itself during that public procedure at the government building. Thirty-eight years is a long time to be together for a lesbian couple. We have not had the structure or permanence of marriage to foster commitment. Those of us who have found the fortitude and are fortunate enough to work through all the issues relationships challenge us with are great models for the entire community. I am honored to have Jan and Joan as mentors, to be a witness to their love and life together.

Monday, May 28, 2012

Marriage Equality

President Obama has made history by endorsing marriage equality for gays and lesbians. “I want everyone treated fairly in this country. We have never gone wrong when we’ve extended rights and responsibilities to everybody,” he said. “That doesn’t weaken families, that strengthens families.”

Obama’s announcement came two days after Republican rival Mitt Romney gave a commencement address at the evangelical Liberty University in Virginia, where he made social issues a main theme of his remarks and touched on the marriage storyline.


“Culture matters. As fundamental as these principles are, they may become topics of democratic debate,” Romney said. “So it is today with the enduring institution of marriage. Marriage is a relationship between one man and one woman.”


While the full political implications of the president’s same-sex marriage remarks remain to be seen, Gallup released a poll showing 51% of Americans approve of Obama’s support for gay couples to marry. A further breakdown of the numbers shows a significant gender gap: Fifty-six percent of women say couples of the same gender should be legally allowed to marry, while 42% of men feel the same way.


The issue became prime political fodder, with several high-profile Republicans pouncing on the president’s remarks.

Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky said he “wasn’t sure that (Obama’s) views on marriage could get any gayer,” sparking laughs among his audience at an event held by Iowa’s Faith and Freedom Coalition.


Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus also made headlines when he said that same-sex marriage was not a “matter of civil rights.”


“I think it’s just a matter of whether or not we’re going to adhere to something that’s been historical and religious and legal in this country for many, many years,” Priebus said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” I mean, marriage has to have a definition, and we just happen to believe it’s between a man and woman.”


We live in an interesting and important time. Will history be made or will we be set back and forced to wait for equality, our human rights and our freedom?