Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts

Thursday, June 30, 2016

Gay Rights as Human Rights

In May, 2015, a full month ahead of what the White House declared LBGT Pride Month, President Obama and the First Lady honored the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia (IDAHOT) – MAY 17  - by saying LGBT rights are “human rights” and that “all people deserve to live free from fear, violence, and discrimination, regardless of who they are or whom they love.”

IDAHOT came just weeks ahead of pride season in June and the Supreme Court’s highly anticipated decision on national marriage equality, which was a welcome “YES!”

National Security Advisor Susan Rice said in a statement, “This day and every day, the United States stands in solidarity with members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community and all those around the world who work to advance the unassailable principle that LGBT rights are human rights”.

In a 2011 presidential memorandum seeking to advance global LGBT rights, Obama stated he was “deeply concerned by the violence and discrimination targeting LGBT
persons around the world, whether it is passing laws the criminalize LGBT status, beating citizens simply for joining peaceful LGBT pride celebraiotns, or killing men, women, and children for their perceived sexual orientation.”

People who are afraid of LGBTs want us to have no rights because of religious doctrine or ignorance about what being LGBT means. Having basic human rights of respect, equality and lack of discrimination doesn’t seem to be a lot to ask for or need. And yet, establishing those human rights has been an uphill battle for many years.

Even though now, in June 2016, a year after the President and First Lady opening announced that we deserve to be treated with equality, even though we have been given the right to marry in all states, there is still a long way to go before we have the same rights as straight people.

Discrimination, hatred, and denying human rights to LGBT people is a travesty. The movement to contain and limit us is tremendous. We need to persevere with the momentum and awareness we have gained  to  keep the vision of the LGBT community having “human rights” alive.


Saturday, April 27, 2013

Timeline on the gay rights movement


Over the past 50 years the gay rights movement in the United States has made slow and steady advancements. In the first five months of 2013 there has been tremendous momentum worldwide and in the United States. A timeline look at key moments over the past 50 years will remind us where we’ve been and all we’ve accomplished.

*In 1960 all 50 states had anti-sodomy laws, many of which targeted intimate acts between persons of the same sex.

*In 1969 members of the gay community in New York riot after police raid the Stonewall Inn, a bar in Greenwich Village frequented by homosexuals. The demonstrations became a catalyst for the gay liberation movement.

*Between 1970-1973, courts in Minnesota, Washington, and Kentucky rebuffed lawsuits filed by same-sex couples seeking marriage licenses.

*In 1986, 57% of Americans thought homosexual relations between consenting adults should not be legal, while 32% believed they should be legal.

*In 1991, three gay couples in Hawaii challenged the constitutionality of laws limiting marriage to one man and one woman. In 1993 the Hawaii Supreme Court provisionally ruled in favor of same-sex marriage.

*In 1996 Congress passed the Defense of Marriage Act, which barred same-sex married spouses from obtaining the same federal benefits as heterosexual married spouses.

*In 1996, 68% of Americans thought same-sex marriage should not be legal.

*In 1997, Comedian Ellen DeGeneres announced she is gay on her TV show.

*In 1998, Hawaii voters approved a constitutional amendment allowing state lawmakers to ban same-sex marriage, which they did. Alaska voters passed a similar amendment.

*In 1999, the Vermont Supreme Court ruled that the traditional definition of marriage discriminates against same-sex couples. It gave the Legislature the option of amending the law or creating a new institution that provided them with the benefits of marriage.

*In 2000, after a divisive debate, the Vermont Legislature approved the nation’s first civil-union law.


*By 2001, 35 states had provisions defending traditional marriage.

*In 2003, the US Supreme Court struck down a Texas anti-sodomy law, decreeing that sexual conduct between consenting adults was off limits to government regulation. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court declared, for the first time, that same-sex couples enjoy a constitutional right to marry.

*Between 2004-2006 eleven states passed measures or constitutional amendments barring gay marriage.

*Between 2006-2007 High courts in New York, New Jersey, Washington, Maryland, and Georgia rejected gay marriage.

*In 2008 High courts in California and Connecticut ruled in favor of gay marriage. Passage of Proposition 8 overturned California’s court decision.

*In 2009 the Iowa high court ruled in favor of gay marriage.

*In 2010 Iowa voters rejected three high court justices up for retention. Also, Congress repealed the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on gays who served in the military.

*In 2012, 48% of Americans supported same-sex marriage, while 43% opposed it.

*Now, in 2013, 9 states recognize same-sex marriage, while 41 do not. Two gay marriage cases have come before the US Supreme Court.

Visibility and consciousness around gay rights is growing exponentially. We are following in the footsteps of black rights and women’s rights. It is our time to be given our human rights and, hopefully we will see that happen this year!

Sources: Gallup, Pew Research Center, Michael Klarman, Harvard University law professor

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Time To Pause and Consider

I was touched by a recent article called Losing my religion for equality... written by former President Jimmy Carter ( who was president of the United States from 1977 to 1981) for the Women's Press, January 25, 2013. It is an honest plea to respect and treat women with equality and give us basic human rights. I encourage you to pause and consider...

I HAVE been a practicing Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world. So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, and unavoidable decision when the convention's leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be "subservient" to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service.

This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths. Nor, tragically, does its influence stop at the walls of the church, mosque, synagogue or temple. This discrimination, unjustifiably attributed to a Higher Authority, has provided a reason or excuse for the deprivation of women's equal rights across the world for centuries.

At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.

The impact of these religious beliefs touches every aspect of our lives. They help explain why in many countries boys are educated before girls; why girls are told when and whom they must marry; and why many face enormous and unacceptable risks in pregnancy and childbirth because their basic health needs are not met.

In some Islamic nations, women are restricted in their movements, punished for permitting the exposure of an arm or ankle, deprived of education, prohibited from driving a car or competing with men for a job. If a woman is raped, she is often most severely punished as the guilty party in the crime.

The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in the West. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.

It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and outdated attitudes and practices - as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.

I understand, however, why many political leaders can be reluctant about stepping into this minefield. Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive areas to challenge. But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy - and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it.

The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by former South African president Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity. We have decided to draw particular attention to the responsibility of religious and traditional leaders in ensuring equality and human rights and have recently published a statement that declares: "The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable."

We are calling on all leaders to challenge and change the harmful teachings and practices, no matter how ingrained, which justify discrimination against women. We ask, in particular, that leaders of all religions have the courage to acknowledge and emphasise the positive messages of dignity and equality that all the world's major faiths share.

The carefully selected verses found in the Holy Scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place - and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence - than eternal truths. Similar biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.

I am also familiar with vivid descriptions in the same Scriptures in which women are revered as pre-eminent leaders. During the years of the early Christian church women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets. It wasn't until the fourth century that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted Holy Scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant positions within the religious hierarchy.

The truth is that male religious leaders have had - and still have - an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundations or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, muhammad, and founders of other great religions - all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.







Monday, May 28, 2012

Marriage Equality

President Obama has made history by endorsing marriage equality for gays and lesbians. “I want everyone treated fairly in this country. We have never gone wrong when we’ve extended rights and responsibilities to everybody,” he said. “That doesn’t weaken families, that strengthens families.”

Obama’s announcement came two days after Republican rival Mitt Romney gave a commencement address at the evangelical Liberty University in Virginia, where he made social issues a main theme of his remarks and touched on the marriage storyline.


“Culture matters. As fundamental as these principles are, they may become topics of democratic debate,” Romney said. “So it is today with the enduring institution of marriage. Marriage is a relationship between one man and one woman.”


While the full political implications of the president’s same-sex marriage remarks remain to be seen, Gallup released a poll showing 51% of Americans approve of Obama’s support for gay couples to marry. A further breakdown of the numbers shows a significant gender gap: Fifty-six percent of women say couples of the same gender should be legally allowed to marry, while 42% of men feel the same way.


The issue became prime political fodder, with several high-profile Republicans pouncing on the president’s remarks.

Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky said he “wasn’t sure that (Obama’s) views on marriage could get any gayer,” sparking laughs among his audience at an event held by Iowa’s Faith and Freedom Coalition.


Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus also made headlines when he said that same-sex marriage was not a “matter of civil rights.”


“I think it’s just a matter of whether or not we’re going to adhere to something that’s been historical and religious and legal in this country for many, many years,” Priebus said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” I mean, marriage has to have a definition, and we just happen to believe it’s between a man and woman.”


We live in an interesting and important time. Will history be made or will we be set back and forced to wait for equality, our human rights and our freedom?

Sunday, July 31, 2011

Human Rights

It seems obvious that lesbians and gays deserve human rights given to others in America. But in the growing Conservative and Christian climate it seems unlikely that it will happen in the near future.

Weren't you surprised when New York State passed its law recently allowing lesbians and gays the right to marry? Who knows how long this will last before it gets caught up in negative legislation that could reverse or tie up the issue? Like California, before New York, there are still debilitating obstacles in the way of equal human rights.

What kind of affect does this have on us? Just below the surface is a message of inequality, judgement, fear and nonacceptance. We become so used to these messages that they almost become "normal". Those of us who are comfortable with our lifestyle simply accept things as they are and go on about living our lives.

Still, whether conscious or unconscious, the messages wear on us and on our lives. Legally we are at a distance disadvantage. Even if we are allowed to marry, as we now can in New York and a few other states, there is no legislation in place to dissolve a legal union between lesbians and gays. Some states are working to find a way through this quagmire.

Living in a country where freedom is supposed to be its basis for existence has not always proven so. We don't have to go back in history very far to find the African Americans struggle for freedom. Even more recently, the Woman's Movement fought for and won our ability to own land and the right to vote.

Today immigration, particularly aimed at Mexicans, is up for questioning around human rights. This struggle is getting more publicity than ours because it is easier for the public to look at and there are many more people involved. It seems as though the public doesn't want to look at the gay issue so they bring another problem to the forefront.

Compared to other issues confronting our world today, gay and lesbian issues appear to vanish. Does that in itself bring out a bit of laziness on our part or a feeling of despair that nothing can be done to help?

We need to remember and remind ourselves often that we not only deserve our human rights, but live in a country that supposedly offers that right to each of its citizens. We must not give up on making an impact for our lifestyle. We must persevere and take every opportunity to be visible with our needs.

I hope that eventually lesbians and gays will have true freedom like other citizens in America. As we grow in numbers, awareness and intentions, I wish for a day when we can celebrate our human rights and our lifestyle in an honorable way. That will be a great day indeed!