Showing posts with label gender identity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gender identity. Show all posts

Saturday, April 29, 2017

Evolving Transgender Stories

While transgender stories have become more visible in the media, there are many identities and terms outside of the two most culturally accepted genders — man and woman — that fall under the trans umbrella. And in many social circles, the vocabulary related to gender identity is unfamiliar or inaccessible.
Gender identity is an extremely personal part of who we are, and how we perceive and express ourselves in the world. It is a separate issue entirely from sex, our biological makeup; or sexual orientation, who we are attracted to. There are dozens of dynamic and evolving terms related to how people identify.
The following definitions represent some of the more current gender identities and the struggles to live them:
Agender: A term for people whose gender identity and expression does not align with man, woman, or any other gender. A similar term used by some is gender-neutral.
Androgynous: Identifying and/or presenting as neither distinguishably masculine nor feminine.
Bigender: Someone whose gender identity encompasses both man and woman. Some may feel that one side or the other is stronger, but both sides are present.
Binary: The gender binary is a system of viewing gender as consisting solely of two identities and sexes, man and woman or male and female.
Cisgender: A term used to describe someone whose gender identity aligns with the sex assigned to them at birth.
Dead name: How some transgender people refer to their given name at birth.
Gender fluid: A person who does not identify with a single fixed gender, and expresses a fluid or unfixed gender identity. One’s expression of identity is likely to shift and change depending on context.
Gender identity is evolving as it becomes more visible. The following are some definitions of experiences that are important in our understanding the complexity.

Gender identity: A person’s innermost concept of self as man, woman, a blend of both, or neither – how individuals perceive themselves and what they call themselves. Gender identity can be the same or different from one’s sex assigned at birth.
Gender non-conforming: A broad term referring to people who do not behave in a way that conforms to the traditional expectations of their gender, or whose gender expression does not fit neatly into a category.
Gender questioning: A person who may be processing, questioning, or exploring how they want to express their gender identity.
Genderqueer: A term for people who reject notions of static categories of gender and embrace a fluidity of gender identity and often, though not always, sexual orientation. People who identify as genderqueer may see themselves as being both male and female, neither male nor female or as falling completely outside these categories.
Gender dysphoria: Clinically defined as significant and durational distress caused when a person’s assigned birth gender is not the same as the one with which they identify.
Gender expression: The external appearance of a person’s gender identity, usually expressed through behavior, clothing, haircut or voice, and which may or may not conform to socially defined masculine or feminine behaviors and characteristics.



Friday, September 30, 2016

The Gender Spectrum

For many people, the terms “gender” and “sex” are used interchangeably, which is incorrect. This idea has become so common, particularly in western societies, that it is rarely questioned. We are born, assigned a sex, and sent out into the world. For many people this is cause for little, if any dissonance. Yet biological sex and gender are different: gender is not inherently nor solely connected to one’s physical anatomy.

A person’s sex includes physical attributes such as external genitalia, sex chromosomes, gonads, sex hormones, and internal reproductive structures. At birth, it is used to assign sex, that is, to identify individuals as male or female. Gender on the other hand is far more complicated. It is the complex interrelationship between an individual’s sex (gender biology), one’s internal sense of self as male, female, both or neither (gender identity) as well as one’s outward presentations and behaviors (gender expression) related to that perception, including their gender role. Together, the intersection of these three dimensions produces one’s authentic sense of gender, both in how people experience their own gender as well as how others perceive it.

Western culture has come to view gender as a binary concept, with two rigidly fixed options: male or female, both grounded in a person’s physical anatomy. Rather than just two distinct boxes, biological gender occurs across a continuum of possibilities. This spectrum of anatomical variations by itself should be enough to disregard the simplistic notions of a binary gender system.

Beyond anatomy, there are multiple domains defining gender these domains can be independently characterized across a range of possibilities. Instead of the static, binary model produced through a solely physical understanding of gender, a far richer tapestry of biology, gender expression, and gender identity intersect in a multidimensional array of possibilities. The gender spectrum represents a more nuanced, and ultimately truly authentic model of human gender.

Gender is taught to us from the moment we are born. Gender expectations and messages bombard us constantly. Upbringing, culture, peers, schools, community, media, and religion are some of the many influences that shape our understanding of this core aspect of self. How you learned and interacted with gender as a young child directly influences how you view the world today. Gendered interactions between parent and child begin as soon as the sex of the baby is known. Many aspects of gender are socially constructed, particularly with regard to gender expression.

Like other social constructs, gender is closely monitored and reinforced by society. Practically everything in society is assigned a gender – toys, colors, clothes and behaviors are just some of the more obvious examples. Through a combination of social conditioning and personal preference, by age three most roles and expectations are so entrenched in our culture that most people cannot imagine any other way. As a result, individuals fitting neatly into these expectations rarely if ever question what gender really means. They have never had to, because the system has worked for them.

“Gender-expansive” is an umbrella term used for individuals that broaden commonly held definitions of gender, including its expression, associated identities, and/or other perceived gender norms, in one or more aspects of their life. These individuals expand the definition of gender through their own identity and/or expression. Some individuals do not identify with being either male or female; others identify as a blend of both, while still others identify with a gender, but express their gender in ways that differ from stereotypical presentations. A gender-expansive person’s preferences and self-expression may fall outside commonly understood gender norms within their own culture; or they may be aligned with them even as one’s internal gender identity doesn’t align with the sex assigned at birth.

The diversity of gender is a normal part of the human experience, across cultures and throughout history. Non-binary gender diversity exists all over the world, documented by countless historians and anthropologists. Examples of individuals living comfortable outside of typical male/female expectations and/or identities are found in every region of the globe. The calabai, and calalai of Indonesia, two-spirit Native Americans, and the hijra of India all represent more complex understandings of gender than allowed for by a simplistic binary model.

What might be considered gender-expansive in one period of history may become gender normative in another. You only need to examine trends related to men wearing earrings or woman sporting g tattoos to see the malleability of social expectations about gender.

When someone is “typically gendered,” they benefit from gender privilege For individuals whose biological sex, gender expression, and gender identity neatly align, often referred to as “cisgender,” there is a level of congruence as they encounter the world around them. Life many forms of social privilege, this is frequently an unexamined aspect of their lives. Forms they fill out, the clothing stores in which they shop, or identification papers they carry bring few if any second thoughts. For a transgender or otherwise gender-expansive person, each of these, and many more examples, is a constant reminder that they move about in a culture that really does not account for their experience. Social privilege comes from an assumption that one’s own perspective is universal; whether related to race, or language, or gender, privilege comes from being part of the “norm.”

Perhaps the most fundamental aspect of a person’s identity, gender deeply influences every part of one’s life. In a society where this crucial aspect of self has been so narrowly defined and rigidly enforced, individuals who exist outside its norms face innumerable challenges. Even those who vary only slightly from the norm can become targets of disapproval. Yet this does not have to be the case forever. Through a thoughtful consideration of the uniqueness and validity of every person’s experiences of self, we can develop greater acceptance for all. Not only will this create greater inclusion for individuals who challenge the norms of gender, it will actually create space for all individuals to more fully explore and celebrate who they are.



Saturday, September 21, 2013

How many people are LGBT?

Increasing number of population-based surveys in the United States and across the world are including questions that allow for an estimate of the size of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender population. Problems with accuracy are writhed with discrepancy in these surveys. Larger samples, confidentiality and anonymity will increase the likelihood of LGBT respondents to identify themselves--producing more precise estimates. It is also challenging to research and measure the LGBT community because of the lack of consistent questions asked on different surveys. Willingness of respondents to report stigmatizing identities and behaviors also affect the variation among estimates of LGBT population.

In measuring sexual orientation, lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals may be identified strictly based on their self-identity or it may be possible to consider same-sex behavior or sexual attraction. Some surveys also access household relationships and provide a way of identifying those who are in same-sex relationships. Defining the transgender population can be challenging because of the varying forms of gender expression or non-conformity. Self-identity is one way to measure the transgender community. 

Federal data sources designed to provide the American Community Survey do not include direct questions regarding sexual orientation or gender identity. This leaves findings from combined population-based surveys the only current mechanism to produce credible estimates for the size of the LGBT community.

Some of the key findings from this research follows:
An estimated 3.5% of adults in the United States identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual and an estimated 0.3% of adults are transgender. This implies that there are approximately 9 million LGBT Americans.

Among adults who identify as LGBT, bisexuals comprise a slight majority (1.8% compared to 1.7% who identify as lesbian or gay). Women are substantially more likely than men to identify as bisexual. Bisexuals comprise more than half of the lesbian and bisexual population among women and conversely, gay men comprise substantially more than half of gay and bisexual men in many of the surveys.

Estimates of those who report any lifetime same-sex behavior and any same-sex sexual attraction are substantially higher than estimates of those who identify as LGBT. An estimated 19 million Americans (8.2%) report that they have engaged in same-sex sexual behavior and nearly 25.6 million Americans (11%) acknowledge at lease some same-sex sexual attraction. There are also nearly 700,000 transgender individuals in the US. Given these findings, it seems reasonable to assert that approximately 9 million Americans identify as LGBT.

By way of comparison, these analyses suggest that the size of the LGBT community is roughly equivalent to the population of New Jersey. The number of adults who have had same-sex sexual experiences is approximately equal to the population of Florida while those who have some same-sex attraction comprise more individuals than the population of Texas.

Understanding the size of the LGBT population is the first step in promoting public policy as well as research topics. The LGBT community has been vastly understudied. Current surveys are demonstrating the viability of sexual orientation and gender identity at the national, state, and local level. This will greatly raise awareness and better enable an understanding of the LGBT community.

Monday, November 9, 2009

Children's Psychosexual Development


Clarifying aspects of sexual development can
eliminate confusion in people's minds. Researchers distinguish between gender identity, sex roles, sex-typed behavior and sexual orientation.


Gender identity refers to a child's self-labeling as either "male" or "female" along with the knowledge that this is a stable, permanent attribute. Research indicates that most children have acquired an accurate, stable gender identity by age three. Their gender identity is highly resistant to change and is based upon what people around them tell them they are.

The development of both sex role stereotypes and sex-typed behaviors is a more gradual, flexible process. Sex roles refer to the child's conception of how members of each sex should behave. Young children (under 4-5 years) are likely to judge the appropriateness of a behavior according to their desire to engage in the behavior. Somewhat older children (around 6 years) develop fairly rigid stereotypical sex role conceptions. Finally, adolescents and adults develop more flexible sex role notions.

Sex-typing refers to the extent to which a child chooses to exhibit or inhibit various sex role stereotyped behaviors. The factors which affect the development of sex roles and sex-typing have not been fully delineated. It is believed that a combination of social factors influences the child: parental reinforcement, social pressure, modeling and imitation of parents, peers and television characters. The child's own cognitive development and biological predisposition also seem to play a role.

Sexual orientation, unlike gender identity, is not necessarily established early in childhood. The causes or factors influencing the development of sexual orientation are by no means fully understood. However, homosexuality is not considered to be the result of an inversion of gender identity. Sexual orientation, like sex roles and sex-typing, is more fluid and amenable to social shaping although recent research emphasizes the biological contributions.

A number of researchers have studied to development of gender identity, sex-typed behavior and sexual orientation among children of lesbian mothers. Green (1978) studied children of both transsexual and lesbian parents. He found that all children had a gender identity consistent with their biological sex and that they engaged in stereotypical and gender appropriate sex-typed behaviors.

Researchers also compared the development of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers and found that sexual orientation of the mother was not a factor in the children's development of gender identity, sex-typed behaviors or sexual orientation.

The general consensus among researchers is that children raised by lesbian mothers develop an appropriate gender identity, follow typical developmental patterns of acquiring sex role concepts and sex-typed behaviors, and generally develop a heterosexual orientation. Although these results follow a traditional pattern, this should not be taken to imply that in individual cases other outcomes such as the development of more androgynous sex-typed behavior or a homosexual orientation is possible.

The scientific literature indicates that being raised by a lesbian mother does not impair a child's psychosexual or psychosocial development. In fact it suggests that children of lesbian mothers may become more tolerant than others of cultural and individual diversity. The most likely result would be that the child will grow up with a balanced understanding of homosexuality without homophobia.