Gay marriage quotes: Reaction to 2013 Supreme Court rulings

The United States Supreme Court delivered a landmark victory for gay rights on June 26, 2013 by forcing the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages in states where it is legal and paving the way for it in California, the most populous state. The two cases, both decided on 5-4 votes, concerned the constitutionality of a key part of a federal law, the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), that denied benefits to same-sex married couples, and a voter-approved California state law enacted in 2008, called Proposition 8, that banned gay marriage.

The following are reaction quotes to the Supreme Court’s decisions in the two gay marriage cases gathered by Associated Press Politico.com:

“The laws of our land are catching up to the fundamental truth that millions of Americans hold in our hearts: when all Americans are treated as equal, no matter who they are or whom they love, we are all more free.” – President Barack Obama.

“While I am obviously disappointed in the ruling, it is always critical that we protect our system of checks and balances. A robust national debate over marriage will continue in the public square, and it is my hope that states will define marriage as the union between one man and one woman.” – House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

“The Supreme Court’s decision affirms that all couples, regardless of their sexual orientation, deserve the same rights and opportunities under the law that my wife and I enjoy. The Defense of Marriage Act was a discriminatory law that unfairly treated LGBT couples differently, and has rightly been relegated to the dust bin of history.” – Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo.

“While we are disappointed in the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, the court today did not impose the sweeping nationwide redefinition of natural marriage that was sought. Time is not on the side of those seeking to create same-sex ‘marriage.’ As the American people are given time to experience the actual consequences of redefining marriage, the public debate and opposition to the redefinition of natural marriage will undoubtedly intensify.” – Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council.

“This is a watershed moment for equality and a clear statement from the highest court in the land that discrimination and hatred have no place in a country founded on the principles of liberty, justice and equality.” – Rick Jacobs, chair of the California-based CourageCampaign.org.

“At the heart of the gay marriage argument is an untruth: unions of two men or women are not the same as unions of husband and wife. The law cannot make it so, it can only require us to paint pretty pictures to cover up deep truths embedded in human nature.” – Maggie Gallagher, fellow at the American Principles Project and co-founder of the National Organization for Marriage.

“Today’s ruling affirms what we stand for as Americans – the guarantee that every person and every family is given equal respect under the law. It means that married same-sex couples can participate fully in federal programs that provide much-needed security for American families.” –Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y.

“We are devastated that the Supreme Court succumbed to political pressure by voting to weaken the sacred institution. They neglected our most precious children who need a mother and a father united in marriage for healthy development.” – Rev. William Owens, president of Coalition of African-American Pastors.

“Marriage is the true foundation for strong families. Every loving, committed couple deserves the basic human right to get married, start a family, and be treated equally under the law. No politician from this day forward should try to stand in the way of this fact.” – Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.

“The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision today puts the court on the right side of history. DOMA is unjust, un-American, and out of step with the values of our country.” – Rep. Jim Moran, D-VA.

“The Supreme Court bent the arc of history once again toward justice. The court placed itself on the right side of history by discarding Section 3 of the defenseless Defense of Marriage Act and by allowing marriage equality for all families in California. The highest court in the land reaffirmed the promise inscribed into its walls: ‘equal justice under law.” – House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

“Today’s rulings advance civil marriage equality, but they should also serve as a call for Christians to embrace religious marriage equality. Countless faithful Christians have lived out their lives in committed same-sex relationships, and we have seen the fruits of their fidelity in our families, our congregations and our communities. If we use this historic moment to see more clearly how their faithfulness contributes to the common good, we will better be able to walk with our LGBT sisters and brothers as an act of Christian faith.” – Rev. Gary Hall, dean of Washington National Cathedral.

Homophobic Bigotry and the Roman Catholic Church

The Roman Catholic Church has been in progressively more and more trouble as the growing numbers of sexual abuse cases have come forward into public awareness. These acts of violence against children (for the most part) are as disturbing as the covering up of them by the Church.

It seems almost ironic, (when they are in trouble over a sexual matter), that they would ‘come out’ with such a strong stand against same-sex couples. Granted, the Church’s position about the meaning of “marriage” has been rigidly set for centuries. It has been loosened in the past twenty-five years with the growth of the numbers of couples who have gotten divorced. Still, its position is set. The statement that came out of the Vatican about same-sex marriages was done with such hatred that it came as a blow in spite of the fact it was not a surprise.

National Public Radio and The Washington Post reported this month that Pope Benedict XVI delivered an address at the Vatican to a delegation of visiting bishops from the United States. In it, he forcefully denounced the “powerful” push to grant same-sex couples the freedom to marry in the United States.

From the NPR article:

The 84-year-old pope acknowledged his comments might sound anachronistic or “countercultural,” particularly to the young. But he told bishops to not back down in the face of “powerful political and cultural currents seeking to alter the legal definition of marriage.”

“Sexual differences cannot be dismissed as irrelevant to the definition of marriage,” he said…

Benedict said a weakened appreciation for traditional marriage … had led to “grave social problems bearing an immense human and economic cost.”

The visiting delegation included bishops from Minnesota, South Dakota, and North Dakota. It was led by Twin Cities Archbishop John Nienstedt, who has inserted himself more deeply into the battle over civil marriage than perhaps any other Catholic bishop across the country. Nienstedt is the same priest who injected a prayer for marriage discrimination into the Catholic Mass, turning the Eucharist—which is sacred to Catholics—into a weapon with which to marginalize and exclude LGBT people. He told the priests of his diocese that if any of them dared to oppose the Church’s efforts to write its discriminatory teachings on marriage into the state constitution, they had better keep their mouths shut.

Pope Benedict’s words, delivered to a group of bishops headed by one of the most notoriously anti-gay figures in the American Catholic Church, amount to nothing less than an official endorsement of the United States’ Catholic Bishops’ all-out campaign of spiritual bullying and forceful political lobbying against American lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people, couples, and families.

It is difficult to even imagine the leader of a religion cloaking anti-gay hatred with the mantle of faith to such an unprecedented degree. His address explicitly endorses malicious religion-based bigotry. At a time when the Roman Catholic Church is in such a publicly controversial position it is almost surprising that such statements would be made. Almost…

Election Year 2012

The election year is upon us. As the Republicans battle it out in their primaries, it is important for us to know where each candidate stands on issues of importance to lesbians, gays, bisexuals and the trans community. Just how do (or don’t) the Republicans stand up for gay rights?

Newt Gingrich was a Representative in Congress from Georgia from 1979-1999 and was Speaker of the House from 1995-1999 when Bill Clinton was president. He says he is the Gay person’s candidate. As reported in the DesMoines Register Newt Gingrich said, “I believe that marriage is between a man and woman. It has been for all of recorded history and I think this is a temporary aberration that will dissipate. I think that it is just fundamentally goes against everything we know.”

In a statement to the conservative Family Leader organization, he said, “As President, I will vigorously enforce the Defense of Marriage Act, which was enacted under my leadership as Speaker of the House, and ensure compliance with its provisions, especially in the military. I will also aggressively defend the constitutionality of DOMA in federal and state courts. I will support sending a federal constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman to the states for ratification. I will also oppose any judicial, bureaucratic, or legislative effort to define marriage in any manner other than as between one man and one woman. I will support all efforts to reform promptly any uneconomic or anti-marriage aspects of welfare and tax policy.”

Newt Gingrich has a lesbian sister, Candace Gingrich-Jones who has been active in LGBT rights and politics for almost as long as her brother has been in office. She has often spoken out against her brother’s policies and says she backs Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential elections. She says, “I could not support the campaign of somebody who doesn’t think I deserve the same rights as other people.

Mitt Romney was the governor of Massachusetts when that state became the first in the United States to legalize gay marriage. In spite of this, Mitt Romney has made it clear he is opposed to gay marriage. As he positions himself as a conservative candidate for U.S. president, he opposes most rights for gays and lesbians.

Mitt Romney signed a pledge from the National Organization for Marriage that says he will support a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, defend the Defense of Marriage Act in court and nominate anti-LGBT judges.

Mitt Romney has opposed gay marriage since his state became the first in the U.S. to legalize gay marriage. He said, “I believe that the family is the foundation of America – and that it needs to be protected and strengthened.” When asked by Chris Matthews of MSNBC about what he thinks the difference between marriage and civil unions is, Romney said, “Well, I would rather have neither, to tell you the truth. I don’t want civil unions or gay marriage.”

When asked if, as a Mormon, he believed homosexuality was a sin, he said, “I separate quite distinctly matters of personal faith from the leadership that one has in a political sense.”

Rick Perry started his political career as a Democrat in Texas’ House of Representatives. He served three terms in that office and switched to the Republican party towards the end of his final term. He became Governor in December 2000 when George W. Bush resigned the office to become President. He has been the Texas Governor since 2000. Rick Perry is touting himself as the Champion of Conservative Principles in his election bid.

Rick Perry is against gay marriage. He signed a pledge with the conservative National Organization for Marriage. It says he will support a constitutional amendment to declare marriage to be a union of one man and one woman. It also includes a vow to support the Defense of Marriage Act in court and to appoint judges who will support traditional marriage.

On December 6, 2011 President Obama released a plan to promote human rights and to end discrimination and persecution of gays and lesbians around the world. Rick Perry issued the following statement in response to the human rights declaration: “This is just the most recent example of an administration at war with people of faith in this country. Investing tax dollars promoting a lifestyle many Americans of faith find so deeply objectionable is wrong. President Obama has again mistaken America’s tolerance for different lifestyles with an endorsement of those lifestyles.”

Ron Paul served in the United States House of Representatives as a Texas Congressman from 1976-1977, again 1979-1985 and currently from 1997-present. He ran for president in 1988 as the Libertarian Party candidate, even through he remained a registered republican.

Ron Paul is opposed to Employment Non-Discrimination Bill that is inclusive of gays, lesbians and transgender. He opposes a transgender-inclusive hate crimes bill. As a matter of fact, he opposes any hate crimes legislation. Ron Paul voted to support a ban of gay adoptions in Washington, DC in 1999.

Ron Paul believes the government should stay out of marriage. At a Values Voter Debate in September 2007, Ron Paul said, “True Christians, I believe, believe that marriage is a church function, not a state function. It’s not a state function. I don’t think you need a license to get married. We should define it.” In May 2011 he was asked about legalizing gay marriage at a presidential debate on Fox News. He said, “I think the government should just be out of it. I think is should be done by the church or private contract and we shouldn’t have this argument. But if we have something to say about marriage, it should be at the state level and not at the Federal Government. Just get the government out of it. It’s one area where it’s totally unnecessary and it’s caused more trouble than necessary.”

Rick Santorum is a former Representative in Congress (1991-1995) and Senator (1995-2007) from Pennsylvania. He is a social conservative often criticized for his anti-gay statements and voting record.

Rick Santorum is opposed to same-sex marriage and recognition of same sex couples. Not only is he opposed to same-sex marriage, he vows to annul any same-sex couples that are already legally married, including those married in California, Iowa, New York, New Hampshire, Connecticut and Vermont. In an interview with MSNBC’s Chuck Todd, he said he would support a federal constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. When asked about those already legally married he replied, “Well, their marriage would be invalid.” While campaigning in Iowa, Rick Santorum told a crowd that equal rights for gays and lesbians would “destabilize the family” and “accommodate a different values structure.”

For years, Rick Santorum has been a vocal opponent of any kind of gay rights legislation or court ruling. In 2003 Rick Santorum said in an interview with the Associated press about the Supreme Court over turning Texas sodomy law, “If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual (gay) sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything.”

In the same interview Santorum equated homosexuality with Incest and Bestiality. He said, “Every society in the history of man has upheld the institution of marriage as a bond between a man and a woman. Why? Because society is based on one thing: that society is based on the future of the society. And that’s what? Children. Monogamous relationships. In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That’s not to pick on homosexuality. It’s not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be.”

Barack Obama, the 44th President of the United States, has rallied support for GLBT like no other President. How does he stand on the issues of importance to gay and lesbian voters?

On Hate Crimes: From the White House Website: President Obama and Vice President Biden will strengthen federal hate crimes protection by passing the Matthew Shepard Act, and reinvigorate enforcement at the Department of Justice’s Criminal Section.

Employment Non-Discrimination: From Whitehouse.gov: President Obama supports the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and believes that our anti-discrimination employment laws should be expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity.

Gays in the Military: In September 2011 President Obama signed legislation to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” For the first time ever, gays and lesbians can serve openly in the United States military.

Gay and Lesbian Adoption: President Obama believes that we must ensure adoption rights for all couples and individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation. He thinks that a child will benefit from a healthy and loving home, whether the parents are gay or not.

On Gay Marriage/Civil Unions: Although Barack Obama has said that he supports civil unions, he is against gay marriage. In an interview with the Chicago Daily Tribune, Obama said, “I’m a Christian. And so, although I try not to have my religious beliefs dominate or determine my political views on this issue, I do believe that tradition, and my religious beliefs say that marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman.”

Obama did vote against a Federal Marriage Amendment and opposed the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. He said he would support civil unions between gay and lesbian couples, as well as letting individual states determine if marriage between gay and lesbian couples should be legalized.

From the White House Web site: President Obama supports full civil unions that give same-sex couples legal rights and privileges equal to those of married couples. He also believes we need to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and enact legislation that would ensure that the 1,100 + federal legal rights and benefits currently provided on the basis of marital statues are extended to same-sex couples in civil unions and other legally-recognized unions. These rights and benefits include the right to assist a loved one in times of emergency, the right to equal health insurance and other employment benefits, and property rights.

In examining the highlights of where these leaders stand on issues of importance to the GLBT community it is clear that we still have a long way to go before we can have the human rights we deserve. In history right now we are making slow progress toward these goals. It is vitally important for us all to vote to continue this direction of growth.